On almost every comment section about generative AI technology (be it with text, images, audio or video), one doesn't have to scroll very far to see comments like "Look how it still can't draw the hands correctly; I'm not worried about art any time soon". Okay, so it still has a ways to go, but what about the stuff that it did accomplish over the last 5 years which many people thought would be impossible? If you want to predict a trajectory, don't you need to take into account how much it's accomplished so far, instead of fixating only on what yet remains to be accomplished? Did people just magically forget that conventional wisdom held for decades that computers should never be able to create new interesting images, at all?
To me when people say this it sounds like someone looking at a snapshot of a car headed towards a cliff, and going like "oh, it's still 1,000 miles away, so we got a lot of time before we need to start worrying", without taking into account the fact that only 1 hour ago it was 2,000 miles away.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteNavigating through different software platforms can be challenging, yet BizHawk offers clarity, efficiency, and reliability. Its performance, user-friendly interface, and continuous development make BizHawk a remarkable platform worth recommending to anyone interested in emulation technology.
ReplyDeleteI’ve noticed significant improvements in workflow efficiency since Detectron2 introduced robust model zoo options, pretrained networks, and extensible components, allowing developers to quickly test hypotheses and deploy reliable computer vision solutions without excessive engineering overhead.
ReplyDeleteOne of the best aspects of Maccy is its commitment to excellence, from navigation to feature accessibility, ensuring users feel supported, empowered, and able to achieve their goals effectively, which makes this website both innovative and dependable.
ReplyDelete